-
Tags
Antioch blessing Brigitte Kahl circumcision commentary Craig S. Keener Donald Francois Tolmie Douglas A. Campbell Galatians Galatians 2:16 Galatians 4:21-31 Galatians and the Imperial Cult Gordon Fee Ian Jeffrey Elmer James DG Dunn Joel Willitts John Riches Justification Justin K. Hardin Ken Schenck Leviticus Logos Bible Software Mark Nanos Martinus C. De Boer Matthias Konradt Michael Bachmann Michael Bird Michael F Bird New Perspective Nijay Gupta NLT Paul Pistis Christou Reuben J Swanson Robert Stutzman Romans Ronald Y. K. Fung SBL 2008 SBL 2009 Scot McKnight Stephen C. Carlson Stephen Chester Steve Runge textual criticism Works of the LawArchives
- January 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Blogroll
All Galatians, All the Time
Blogroll
Review of Thomas R. Schreiner’s commentary available
Schreiner, Thomas R. Galatians. Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, 9. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010. 0310243726, 9780310243724.
David Luckensmeyer of Australian Catholic University has reviewed Schreiner’s commentary and you can read all about it on bookreviews.org: http://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/7879_8605.pdf
This review is most concerned with the physical layout of the commentary and editorial issues and secondly with critiquing with Schreiner’s Baptist presuppositions. In summary “Schreiner offers a reasonable analysis of most verses …. it is the ideological tendencies of the author that mar an otherwise very readable commentary on Galatians.” One is left to conclude that conservatives will love this commentary whilst others will find it lacking.
Like this: